Legal Opinion

Motorists Mut. Ins. v. Bittler

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Decided February 20, 1968No. 786792PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMoNagle, J.

On May 3, 1961, the plaintiff insurance ■ company issued its automobile policy to Ralph A. Bittler, a defendant herein. The policy included a standard type endorsement for protection against uninsured motorists. The automobile described in the policy was a 1957 Ford convertible. The names of the insured were Ralph A. Bittler and Phyllis Bittler, husband and wife.

*24The action was submitted for a decision of the court on the amended petition of the plaintiff, the answer of the defendant, Mr. Bittler, the evidence (which by stipulation consists of the insurance policy, the Uninsured Motorists…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rider v. LynchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Philip AkersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
  3. Lalos v. TicklerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Elledge v. WarrenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Bell v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API