Legal Opinion

Lalos v. Tickler

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 31, 1961No. 4892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The first article in the disputed Allstate Insurance Co. policy is the coverage provision on page 1 at the very beginning of the instrument. In this article, the defendant Allstate contracts to insure the defendant Tickler against all damages which Tickler shall be legally obligated to pay on account of the “ownership, maintenance or use ... of the owned automobile, a substitute automobile or a non-owned automobile.” On page 2 of the policy appears Article X with the heading in large letters, “Definitions,” under which the insured and the three classes of automobiles covered by Article I are…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Great Lakes Container Corporation v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  2. Motorists Mut. Ins. v. BittlerCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1968
  3. Haugen v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. of LansingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Christensen v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Powell v. Home Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API