Legal Opinion

Sheppard v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 3, 1993No. 88-171; CA A65946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

In this lease dispute, plaintiffs petition for prevailing party attorney fees for the appeal. Defendants object to the petition. We overrule defendants’ objections and allow attorney fees.

In Sheppard v. Smith, 116 Or App 267, 840 P2d 1367 (1992), plaintiffs alleged that defendants breached a lease and sought ejectment and damages. Defendants denied those claims and counterclaimed for breach of the lease, for damages for breach of a right of first refusal to purchase real property and for intentional interference with contract. The jury found that defendants had not breached the lease, but in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Portland Trading Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Henderson v. Jantzen, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Sheppard v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michaelson v. MichaelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API