Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Jantzen, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1987No. TC 84-27; CA A35739; SC S33553PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

The issue in this case is whether the Court of Appeals properly awarded attorney fees incurred in an appeal that resulted in the reversal of a summary judgment. Under statutes to be discussed below, that court had the power to award the fees. However, the court’s disposition of the underlying appeal left a trial to be held, with the ultimate prevailing party necessarily undetermined until after that trial. We hold that, under such circumstances, the Court of Appeals erred in awarding attorney fees and, accordingly, we reverse.

This case began when plaintiff filed an action for unlawful…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Jantzen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. UNITED STATES NAT. BANK OF OREGON v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Henderson v. Jantzen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Village at North Pointe Condominiums Ass'n v. Bloedel Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Scholes v. Sipco Services & Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Meduri Farms, Inc. v. Robert Jahn Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Akins v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API