Legal Opinion

Around the World Merchandisers, Inc. v. Rayovac Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 5, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MENZA, J.S.C.

Defendant moves for summary judgment. The issue in this case is whether the statute of frauds bars the enforcement of an oral contract between a manufacturer and a middleman engaged by the manufacturer to solicit and service customers for the sale of the manufacturer’s product. There are no New Jersey cases which have addressed this precise issue.

Defendant is a manufacturer of batteries. Plaintiff is a wholesaler of general merchandise. In order to promote the sale of its batteries, defendant instituted a marketing program known as the “checkout merchandising program.” This plan…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Songbird Jet Ltd., Inc. v. Amax Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. Wico Corp. v. Willis IndustriesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  3. Fargo Glass & Paint Co. v. Globe American Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
  4. Buttorff v. United Electronic Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  5. Stone v. Krylon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API