Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Higgins
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 1930No. 22082. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
The department of public works of Washington instituted this proceeding by the filing of a petition pursuant to Rem. Comp. Stat., § 10442, alleging that the defendants, ever since on or about May 20, 1928, have been operating as an auto transportation company in the carriage of freight between Seattle and Everett without having first obtained a certificate as required by chapter 111, Laws of 1921, p. 388, as amended and supplemented, and that they would continue so to operate unless restrained by order of court. The department prayed for relief by mandamus or such order as the .court might…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Cushing v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Carlsen v. CooneyWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Davis & Banker, Inc. v. MetcalfWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Big Bend Auto Freight v. OgersWashington Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Addy v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1930