Legal Opinion
Big Bend Auto Freight v. Ogers
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 13, 1928No. 21249. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
The appellants are the holders of certificates of public convenience and necessity, issued by the department of public works pursuant to Session Laws of 1921, p. 338, ch. Ill (Rem. Comp. Stat., § 6387), authorizing them to engage in the transportation of freight between Spokane and Davenport, Washington. They have in every way complied with the law with respect to the filing of tariffs, time schedules and have made the necessary quarterly reports to the department.
Respondent lives in Davenport and is apparently engaged generally in the transfer business; has complied with Session Laws of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Stimson Timber Co. v. KuykendallWashington Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by12 opinions
- Weaver v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
- Stoner v. UndersethMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Trudeau v. Pacific States Box & Basket Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
- Malone v. Van EttenIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
- Miles v. Enumclaw Co-Operative Creamery Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.