Legal Opinion

Davis & Banker, Inc. v. Metcalf

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1924No. 18526PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Appellant is the holder of a certificate of necessity and convenience therefor, and operates a freight and passenger stage line on the state highway between Pateros and "Winthrop, Washington.

The town of Twisp is located on this highway between termini, and is one of appellant’s stops. The Mutual Creamery Company maintains a cream station at Twisp, and there purchases and receives from numerous farmers in the vicinity eggs and cream products. Respondent acts as agent for the creamery company in purchasing this merchandise, and receives a commission on the amount of butterfat purchased. He also…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis & Banker, Inc. v. NickellWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Carlsen v. CooneyWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Davis v. ClevingerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Davis v. MacKayWashington Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. Kruvant v. KruvantNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Holmes v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State v. MorettiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Stephenson v. BinfordDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API