Kopischke v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Magnet, Justice.
Plaintiff’s truck was damaged in a railroad crossing accident. There was a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
*24Plaintiff is the owner of a farm which adjoins defendant’s right of way to the west on the southerly outskirts of Lake Crystal. The farm is reached over a private road from the east which crosses defendant’s tracks. These run north and south. On November 15, 1947, at about 5 or 5:30 p.m., Laverne Kopisehke, son of plaintiff, was operating plaintiff’s two-ton Ford truck west over and on this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Keyes v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Hawkins v. Garford Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Adam v. EnglishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
- Hanson v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Doolittle v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Long v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- A. M. Knapp v. C. W. StyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Fukida v. Hon/Hawaii Service and RepairHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Spreader Specialists, Inc. v. Monroc, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1988
- Bartl v. City of New UlmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.