Legal Opinion

Kopischke v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 6, 1950No. 35,010PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magnet, Justice.

Plaintiff’s truck was damaged in a railroad crossing accident. There was a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

*24Plaintiff is the owner of a farm which adjoins defendant’s right of way to the west on the southerly outskirts of Lake Crystal. The farm is reached over a private road from the east which crosses defendant’s tracks. These run north and south. On November 15, 1947, at about 5 or 5:30 p.m., Laverne Kopisehke, son of plaintiff, was operating plaintiff’s two-ton Ford truck west over and on this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keyes v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Hawkins v. Garford Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  3. Adam v. EnglishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Hanson v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Doolittle v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Long v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. A. M. Knapp v. C. W. StyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  3. Fukida v. Hon/Hawaii Service and RepairHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Spreader Specialists, Inc. v. Monroc, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Bartl v. City of New UlmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API