Manfredi v. Maher
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
CLARIE, Chief Judge.
The named plaintiffs 1 have filed this § 1983 action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, to enjoin the defendant, the Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS), from enforcing a DSS regulation which calls for interspousal income attributions in determining eligibility for Title XIX (Medicaid) benefits. 2 The effect of the said regulation is to allocate all but $2662 of a qualified couple’s yearly income, from whatever source, to institutional support, where one of the spouses is confined for a long term…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Norman v. St. ClairCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Brown v. StantonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Robbins v. DeBuonoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Panthers v. Secretary, Department of Health, Education & WelfareDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Herweg v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.