The Gulnare
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana
In Admiralty.
1Opinion of the CourtBillings, J.
This is a suit on a marine policy of insurance upon the steam-ship Guiñare. The loss of the vessel is admitted, and the binding force of the policy, with two exceptions. It is claimed that the vessel insured was not seaworthy, and that Moroney had no insurable interest.
1. Had Moroney an insurable interest? The policy is “on account of whom it may concern. Loss, if any, payable to Mm as his interest may appear.” Therefore he must have had an insurable interest to enable him to maintain this action. The vessel belonged, so far as the registered title showed, to Boyd Bros.; but the real owners…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Pacific Coast S. S. Co. v. Bancroft-Whitney Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Massey Steamship Co. v. Importers & Exporters InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Clinchfield Fuel Co. v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Hewlett v. The Millie R. BohannonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894
- Land v. Franklin Nat. Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.