Bestran Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellant v. Eagle Comtronics, Inc., Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Bestran appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion for injunction restraining Eagle from prosecuting an identical action in New York. After the denial of the motion for injunction, Bestran filed a timely motion for reconsideration “pursuant to Local Rule 3.16 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 59(e).” Thirty days after the denial of the injunction, but before the district court had ruled on the motion for reconsideration, Bestran filed its notice of appeal.
A timely filed motion for reconsideration under a local rule is a motion to alter or amend a judgment under Fed.R.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gainey v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship ClerksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
3Cited by28 opinions
- Schroeder v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- SCHROEDER v. McDONALDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- James F. Taylor v. MacE KnappCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Honeycutt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Hansen v. Finn (In Re Curry & Sorensen, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.