Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 10, 1918No. 8613PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District 'Court, Jefferson County ; Cham Jones, Judge. Action by Cora Tucker against J. M. Dickinson and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUMMONS, C.

The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the court below. This action was commenced to recover damages from the defendants for injuries sustained by the plaintiff in alighting from a railway train of the defendant. The petition alleges that plaintiff was a pas senger upon a railway train o£ defendants from Sngden to Waurika; that up on arrival at Waurika tlie plaintiff attempted to alight from the train of defendants, and in so doing she fell and suffered injuries for which recovery is sought; that her fall was occasioned hy the negligence of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yarnell v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. New Orleans, Jackson, & Great Northern Railroad v. StathamMississippi Supreme Court · 1869
  3. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. FickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Interstate Compress Co. v. ArthurSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kurn v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. St. Louis, S. F. Ry. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API