Legal Opinion

Bermite Powder Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1952No. L. A. 21446PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Bermite Powder Company sued to recover interest upon the amount of a tax claim which was allowed. The appeal of the Franchise Tax Board is from a judgment in favor of the taxpayer.

As stated in the stipulation of facts, Bermite paid to the state taxes based upon its income for the years 1943 and 1944. After the renegotiation of its contract with the federal government, Bermite refunded about two-thirds of the amount which it had received during those years. The Franchise Tax Commissioner allowed Bermite’s claim for more than $30,000 paid as taxes but rejected its demand for interest upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Union League Club v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. People v. AtchleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. SalasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. SpriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. People v. CavanaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. BrommelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API