Legal Opinion

Warner v. Fordham

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is a suit to foreclose a mechanics lien. Defendants appeal from a decree in favor of plaintiff.

Plaintiff furnished labor in the construction of four houses, oue on each of four lots numbered 7, 8, 9 and 11. Lot 10 separated lots 9 and 11. The lien shows that the original amount due was $5,179.50, from which is deducted $1,750 designated as a cash payment, leaving a balance of $8,429.50.

Plaintiff’s amended complaint alleges that plaintiff was originally entitled to $5,179.50; that $1,750 was paid of which $1,250 was credited against Lot 11 as full payment of the contract price allocated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Caird Engineering Works v. Seven-Up Gold Mining Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. James A. C. Tait & Co. v. StrykerOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Willamette Mills Co. v. SheaOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Warrenton Lumber Co. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Phillips v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. S.K. Drywall, Inc. v. Developers Financial Group, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API