Warner v. Fordham
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This is a suit to foreclose a mechanics lien. Defendants appeal from a decree in favor of plaintiff.
Plaintiff furnished labor in the construction of four houses, oue on each of four lots numbered 7, 8, 9 and 11. Lot 10 separated lots 9 and 11. The lien shows that the original amount due was $5,179.50, from which is deducted $1,750 designated as a cash payment, leaving a balance of $8,429.50.
Plaintiff’s amended complaint alleges that plaintiff was originally entitled to $5,179.50; that $1,750 was paid of which $1,250 was credited against Lot 11 as full payment of the contract price allocated…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Caird Engineering Works v. Seven-Up Gold Mining Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1940
- James A. C. Tait & Co. v. StrykerOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Willamette Mills Co. v. SheaOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Warrenton Lumber Co. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Phillips v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- S.K. Drywall, Inc. v. Developers Financial Group, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991