Legal Opinion

Hall v. Essner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1934No. 26,251PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTreanor, J.

—The Bank of Tocsin was organized as a bank of discount and deposit pursuant to the provisions of an act of the General Assembly of the State of Indiana entitled “An act to regulate and supervise the business of banking by individuals, partnerships or unincorporated persons,” approved March 8, 1907. (Acts 1907, ch. 113, p. 174; §§3925-3938, Burns Ann. Ind. St. 1926, §§18-2701—18-2714, Burns 1933, §§8028-8036, Baldwin’s 1934.

On May 23, 1925, a receiver was appointed for said-bank. On May 26, 1928, this action was commenced in the Wells circuit court by the plaintiff as a creditor of said bank…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re DennyIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Gaiser v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Harris v. Muskingum Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Uhl v. HarveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Brown v. KillianIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harker v. McKissockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. Kimmel v. CaptainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Lindley v. SewardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Snyder v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Wyncoop, Admr. v. LaughnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API