Legal Opinion

Harris v. Muskingum Manufacturing Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1837PublishedCited by 24 opinions

ERROR to the Allen Circuit Court.-

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

The Muskingum Manufacturing Company brought an action of debt against.Harris,- The declaration is, substantially, as follows:—

The Muskingum Manufacturing Company complain of Elisha Harris, otherwise Elisha B. Harris, in custody, &c. of a plea that he render to the plaintiffs the sum of 1,274 dollars and 87 cents, which he owes, &c. For that whereas the plaintiffs, on, &c., at, &c., recovered against said Elisha B. Harris 1,274 dollars and 87 cents above demanded, adjudged as their damages, and the sum of 11 dollars and 49 cents for their costs. Whereby an action has accrued to the plaintiffs…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. President of the Bank of United States v. HaskinsNew York Supreme Court · 1799

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Heaston v. Cincinnati & Fort Wayne RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Ohio Oil Co. v. DetamoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Mackenzie v. Board of School TrusteesIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Indianapolis Sun Co. v. HorrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Clarke v. Omaha & Southwestern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1877

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API