Paro v. Whitefield Savings Bank & Trust Co.

The defendants did not surrender the possession ■of the bank premises to Smith, and if they were not legally responsible for the creation of the condition of danger to the traveling public from which the plaintiff received his injury, they had legal power to remedy it. Upon this view of the case, one question is whether the defendants knew or ought to have known of the condition in time to have prevented the injury by removing its cause. Chickering v. Thompson, 76 N. H. 311. Whether such a finding could be made upon the evidence may be doubtful; but if the defendants are responsible for the…