Legal Opinion
Robbins v. Travelers Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtValente, J.
Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint herein under rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice for failure to state a cause of action, and further moves to vacate a warrant of attachment heretofore obtained by the plaintiff.
The action is upon four separate policies of insurance issued by the defendant to the plaintiff, each policy containing a disability clause. The complaint alleges that on January 10, 1932, the plaintiff became totally and permanently disabled, and furnished due proofs of this fact to the defendant, who accepted and recognized plaintiff’s claim and paid the monthly benefits…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Toplitz v. . BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Killian v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Kelly v. . Security Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kuhn v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- McCann v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Robbins v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1934