Edwards v. Board of County Commissioners
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
APODACA Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s judgment based on its holding that Defendants Bernalillo County Board of Commissioners and the Commissioners, individually, (the County) had zoning authority that included Plaintiffs’ properties. Plaintiffs raise six issues on appeal; whether: (1) collateral estoppel prevented the County from litigating the issue of whether the County’s Ordinance 213 was valid; (2) the County had statutory authority to enforce Ordinance 213 against Plaintiffs in 1990-93; (3) a “saving clause” in 1975 N.M.Laws, Chapter 312, Section 10, saved Ordinance…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Klineline v. BlackhurstNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- City Commission v. State ex rel. NicholsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Antillon v. New Mexico State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- City of Santa Fe v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bogle Farms, Inc. v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Hartman v. Texaco Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Estate & Heirs of Sanchez v. County of BernalilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Meridian Oil, Inc. v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- Costain v. REGULATION & LICENSING DEPT.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.