Legal Opinion

Hayne Federal Credit Union v. Bailey

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 11, 1997No. 24678PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOAL, Acting Chief Justice:

In this foreclosure action, Hayne Federal Credit Union (“Credit Union”) appeals from the order of the special referee who held that Harold Bailey (“Father”) owned the property in dispute by virtue of a resulting trust. We reverse and remand.

Factual/Procedural Background

Father contracted to purchase a house located on Pumpkin Lane in Sumter County. He had put down $25,000 in earnest money to make the purchase. The real estate agent involved in the transaction indicated that Father had told her to prepare the contract identifying Father’s son, William E. Bailey…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tiger, Inc. Ex Rel. Green Apple Partnership v. Fisher Agro, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Lollis v. LollisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. United States v. SiegelDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  4. Collier v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  5. Caulk v. CaulkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. McClanahan Ex Rel. Richland County Landowners & Taxpayers v. Richland County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Hawkins v. Bruno Yacht Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Cothran v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Estate of DimondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API