Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hawes v. Colorado Division of Insurance

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 3, 2003No. 01SC743Published

1DissentJustice Rice

I respectfully dissent. The majority concludes that the Insurance Commissioner may have the implied statutory authority to award attorney fees to several intervenors. Because I find no basis for such authority in this case, I would affirm the court of appeals.

I. FACTS

This case arises out of the 1999 conversion of Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Colorado, from a non-profit to a for-profit corporation. Petitioners, Taylor Hawes and the Colorado Health Care Conversions Project, and their respective attorneys, Kelly, Haglund, Garnsey and Kahn, LLC…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Lake County Board of Review v. Property Tax Appeal BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Beaver Meadows v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. Eugene G. & Lorraine B. Feistman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Colorado State Board of Land Commissioners v. Colorado Mined Land Reclamation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API