Hawes v. Colorado Division of Insurance
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Rice
I respectfully dissent. The majority concludes that the Insurance Commissioner may have the implied statutory authority to award attorney fees to several intervenors. Because I find no basis for such authority in this case, I would affirm the court of appeals.
I. FACTS
This case arises out of the 1999 conversion of Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Colorado, from a non-profit to a for-profit corporation. Petitioners, Taylor Hawes and the Colorado Health Care Conversions Project, and their respective attorneys, Kelly, Haglund, Garnsey and Kahn, LLC…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lake County Board of Review v. Property Tax Appeal BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Beaver Meadows v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Eugene G. & Lorraine B. Feistman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Colorado State Board of Land Commissioners v. Colorado Mined Land Reclamation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.