Legal Opinion

Victor Surpitski v. Hughes-Keenan Corporation, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 6, 1966No. 6689_1PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT.

2Per curiam

The sole question to which we will address ourselves in this case is one of practice — how quickly may the whistle be sounded on a plaintiff who is seeking to show that a foreign defendant is subject to service within the jurisdiction. Plaintiff’s complaint was filed on August 31, 1965 and served the same day on the Massachusetts Secretary of State as alleged agent for defendant United States Air Conditioning Corp., hereafter Air, and Aerial-Lift Repair, Inc., hereafter Aerial. 1 Air is a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business in Ohio. Aerial is of…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aro Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Automobile Body Research CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965

4Cited by75 opinions

  1. John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Robert S. Boit v. Gar-Tec Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. Metcalfe v. Renaissance Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Swiss American Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  5. Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API