Legal Opinion
In Re Wella A.G.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 29, 1988No. Appeal 88-1150PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.
This case is before us for the second time. In the prior opinion we reversed the refusal of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board) to register a trademark because, we held, the Board’s action rested upon a misinterpretation of section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d) (1982). We remanded the case to the Board for further proceedings in accordance with our opinion. In re Wella A.G., 787 F.2d 1549, 229 USPQ 274 (1986).
On the remand, the Board held that section 2(d) did not bar registration, but denied registration on the new ground that the applicant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Northern Helex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Federal Power Commission v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Frank E. Paulik and Robert G. Schultz v. Nabil Rizkalla and Charles N. WinnickCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In Re Wella A.G.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Browder v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- Bice v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Bice v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- In Re Wella A.G.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- In re Application of Dayton Power & Light Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.