Legal Opinion
Bice v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 3, 2008No. 02-784CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
BASKIR, Judge.
Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs Application for Attorney Fees filed pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The Government moves to dismiss the Application on the ground that a provision set forth in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2008, Pub.L. No. 110-161, 121 Stat. 1844 (2007), strips this Court of jurisdiction to entertain the Application. The Government argues in the alternative that Plaintiff is not entitled to attorney fees. For the reasons stated below, we DENY the Government’s Motion to Dismiss and GRANT…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Infinite Information Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Tripoli Rocketry Ass'n v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & ExplosivesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010