Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. James
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The action is on a life insurance policy.
The contract stipulated the insurer shall incur no liability until “a policy is issued and delivered, and the full first premium stipulated in the policy has been paid to and accepted by the Company during the lifetime of the applicant.”
By appropriate pleas this provision was set up with allegations that the policy was never delivered, nor the full first premium paid, during the life of the insured.
The controlling issues of law and fact relate to this defense.
■ Roosevelt James, the insured, made application through the local agent of defendant at…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. NewtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. MandelbaumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Hanna v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Watts v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Reid v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- National Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Grabove v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. McGheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.