Legal Opinion

Hartford Fire Insurance v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 13, 1989No. 88 Civ. 8460(RWS), 88 Civ. 8688(RWS)PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Federated Department Stores, Inc. (“Federated”), et al., have moved pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6), 56, and 9(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., for an order dismissing the first amended complaint of Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”) and the complaint of Bernard Segal, M.D. (“Se-gal”) (together with Hartford referred to as the “Plaintiffs”), trustee individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the motions are granted and the complaints are dismissed in their entirety.

The Parties

Hartford is a Connecticut insurance company…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Pittsburg, Inc. v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  3. Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. Chrysler Capital Corp. v. Century Power Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  5. Lenz v. Associated Inns & Restaurants Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API