Roulan v. County of Onondaga
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum:
Plaintiff commenced this action seeking, inter alia, a declaration that various sections of the assigned counsel plan in defendant County of Onondaga (County) were invalid. Defendant Onondaga County Bar Association Assigned Counsel Program, Inc., incorrectly sued as the Assigned Counsel Program, Inc. (ACP), established that plan (hereafter, ACP Plan) pursuant to County Law article 18-B through a contract with the Onondaga County Bar Association (OCBA).
Plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment seeking a declaration that the contract and handbook containing the ACP Plan were…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Society of Plastics Industry, Inc. v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Morgenthau v. ErlbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re SmileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zeigler v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Roulan v. County of OnondagaNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- CAGNINA, CHRISTINA G. v. ONONDAGA COUNTYAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- CAGNINA, CHRISTINA G. v. ONONDAGA COUNTYAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Angel L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.