Legal Opinion

Shortt v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 2, 1987No. 86-2661PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

This case involves interpretation of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (the Act). (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 85, par. 1 — 101 et seq.) Plaintiff Peter Shortt alleged in his complaint that on August 7, 1979, defendant Daniel Joyce, an employee of defendant city of Chicago (the city), drove a Chicago police car into Shortt while Shortt was crossing a street. On December 19, 1979, Shortt sent notice of his intent to sue the city of Chicago to the corporation counsel’s office. He filed his complaint on June 12, 1981, and both parties conducted discovery for five…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Droste v. KernerIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Reynolds v. City of TuscolaIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Lakeview Trust & Savings Bank v. EstradaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. King v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Housewright v. City of LaHarpeIllinois Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Joseph v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Niziolek v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Murphy v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Sanders v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. McClintock v. Bi-State Development AgencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API