Legal Opinion
McClintock v. Bi-State Development Agency
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 7, 1992No. 5-91-0364PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
591 N.E.2d 967 (1992)
228 Ill. App.3d 382
169 Ill.Dec. 463
Floyd R. McCLINTOCK, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
BI-STATE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 5-91-0364.
Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District.
May 7, 1992.
John L. McMullin, Beth Kamp Veath, Brown & James, P.C., St. Louis, Mo. and Belleville, for defendant-appellant.
Roger S. Murphy, Edwardsville, for plaintiff-appellee.
2Opinion of the Court · HarrisonJustice Harrison
Defendant, Bi-State Development Agency (Bi-State), brings this permissive interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (134 Ill.2d R. 308) from an order of the circuit court of St. Clair County which set…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Maki v. FrelkIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Williams v. CrickmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Cooper v. Bi-State Development AgencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Smith v. County of WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Grady v. Bi-State Development AgencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Hubble v. Bi-State Development AgencyIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- Mueller v. BD. OF FIRE & POLICE COM'RS OF ZURICHAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Sharon Wildey v. Richard A. Springs, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Bill v. Education Officers Electoral Board of Community Consolidated School District No. 181Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Powell v. City of PascagoulaMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.