Legal Opinion
State v. Benedict
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 16, 1986No. C8-86-194PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Subsequent to appellant’s conviction for three counts of criminal sexual conduct, appellant’s counsel moved for a new trial or, in the alternative, a Schwartz hearing. The court denied both motions, finding insufficient evidence to support either a new trial or to compel a Schwartz hearing. We reverse.
FACTS
Appellant was charged with two counts of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.342(a) and two counts of criminal sexual conduct in the second degree in violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.343(a). The incidents upon which appellant was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State v. StoffletSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. MingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BenedictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986