State v. Stofflet
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROGOSHESKE, Justice.
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree. Minn.St. 609.344(c) (using force or coercion to accomplish sexual penetration). He was sentenced by the trial court to a 10-year term. Defendant’s direct appeal was stayed so he could petition for postconviction relief. When that petition was denied, defendant combined an appeal from that order with the reinstated direct appeal. Defendant raises two issues: (1) whether, notwithstanding his failure to object at trial, he should receive a new trial on the ground that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Zimmerman Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. Witte Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. LoebachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. EatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. BenedictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.