Legal Opinion

State v. Stofflet

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 8, 1979No. 47591PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGOSHESKE, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree. Minn.St. 609.344(c) (using force or coercion to accomplish sexual penetration). He was sentenced by the trial court to a 10-year term. Defendant’s direct appeal was stayed so he could petition for postconviction relief. When that petition was denied, defendant combined an appeal from that order with the reinstated direct appeal. Defendant raises two issues: (1) whether, notwithstanding his failure to object at trial, he should receive a new trial on the ground that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Zimmerman Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. Witte Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. LoebachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. EatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. State v. BenedictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API