Legal Opinion

Root Refiners, Inc. v. Robertson.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 27, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). According to the evidence adduced 'by the plaintiff, oil was allowed to escape from the refineries of the defendant and to flow into a running stream on 40 acres of land used by the plaintiff for watering the cattle on his dairy farm. The evidence for the plaintiff also shows that formerly the oil from the defendant’s refineries had flowed in another direction, and that it might easily be diverted from flowing- into the stream used by the plaintiff for watering- his dairy cattle. Under these circumstances the jury was warranted in finding that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. MackeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. TyteniczSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Carson v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  3. Oklahoma City v. TyeteniczSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API