Legal Opinion
Eastwood v. Froehlich
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 27, 1976No. Civ. 46979PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON, J.
Introduction
Following a nonjury trial on plaintiff-respondent Richard W. Eastwood’s (hereinafter plaintiff), five-count complaint, the trial court ruled in favor of defendant-appellant Kent Froehlich, as executor under the will Of Bruce E. Lewis, deceased, upon all counts except the fourth. This fourth count sought recovery • for violation of the California Franchise Investment Law. (Corp. Code, § 31000 et seq.) The trial court gave judgment in favor of plaintiff as to the fourth count based on liability of defendant executor’s decedent Lewis under section 31302 of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennaluna & Company, Inc., Benjamin A. Harrison, and Harry F. Magnuson v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Safeway Portland Employees' Federal Credit Union v. C. H. Wagner & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Hogan v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Cade v. Mid-City Hospital Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. BusickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Classen v. WellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Neptune Society Corp. v. LonganeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Spahn v. Guild Industries Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Sonoma County Organization of Public/Private Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Estate of AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.