Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Anderson v. Ryland

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 6, 1960No. 5-2195Published

1ConcurrenceGeorge Rose Smith, J.

I agree with the majority’s reasoning and conclusion, but I would express somewhat more emphatically my disagreement with the decision in Atkinson v. Lyle, 191 Ark. 61, 85 S. W. 2d 715. Insofar as that case holds that a court of equity is without power to permit any deviation from the exact language of a charitable trust I think the decision to be erroneous, and I would overrule it outright.

The power of chancery to sanction a deviation is generally recognized in the case of private trusts as well as charitable trusts. Rest., Trusts, §§ 167 and 381. We have approved the doctrine with respect…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Van Buren School District No. 42Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  2. McCarroll v. Grand Lodge of the I. O. O. F.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  3. Atkinson v. LyleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  4. Biscoe v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1861
  5. Donaghey Foundation v. Little Rock UniversitySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API