Legal Opinion

Biscoe v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 15, 1861PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court. Hon. II. F. Fairchild, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice English

The bill in this case was filed by the state, against the trustees and officers of the Beal Estate Bank, to divest them of the trust, and to compel them to account for the assets which came into their hands under the deed of assignment, made by the bank 2d of April, 1842.

Henry L. Biseoe, the appellant, was one of the original, and also one of the residuary trustees, and acted as such from the time of the execution of the deed, until 20th of April, 1855, when the trustees were removed by an order of the JPulaski chancery court, made in this suit, and the assets placed in the hands of a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kendall v. New-England Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1840

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ross v. ConwellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Banking Co. v. . LeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. In Re Fidelity Union Title, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  4. Anderson v. RylandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  5. Anderson v. RylandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API