Craven v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON REHEARING.
January 31, 1923.
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The appellant renews his complaint of the failure of the court to instruct the jury upon the law of insanity.
Upon a re-examination of the record, this court has concluded that the condition of the record is such as to present the question for review. As prepared, the record is to some degree confusing, which accounts for this court declining to review the matter upon the original • hearing.
We give a synopsis of the evidence relied upon to present the issue. The appellant was nineteen years of age. His mother said that she had tried to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hurst v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Beeson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Overstreet v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Hogue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.