Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Bornstein

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided September 25, 1984No. 83-891PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONIELSON, Presiding Judge.

Respondent husband appeals and petitioner wife cross-appeals from the decree dissolving the parties’ marriage. On appeal, respondent husband asserts (1) that his alimony obligation is excessive; (2) that the trial court should have provided for the alimony obligation to terminate upon his death; (3) that the property division is inequitable; and (4) that the trial court should not have directed him to pay monthly support for the parties’ son but should instead have set up a child support trust fund, with contributions from both parties. On cross-appeal, petitioner…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. In re the Marriage of FleenerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. In Re the Marriage of CastleCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1981
  4. In Re the Marriage of HayneCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1983
  5. In Re Marriage of BurhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of Steven Michael Gust and Linda Leann Gust Upon the Petition of Steven Michael GustSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. In Re the Marriage of LaloneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  3. In Re the Marriage of HavranCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1987
  4. In Re the Marriage of HowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  5. In Re the Marriage of McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API