In Re the Marriage of Bornstein
Court of Appeals of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
DONIELSON, Presiding Judge.
Respondent husband appeals and petitioner wife cross-appeals from the decree dissolving the parties’ marriage. On appeal, respondent husband asserts (1) that his alimony obligation is excessive; (2) that the trial court should have provided for the alimony obligation to terminate upon his death; (3) that the property division is inequitable; and (4) that the trial court should not have directed him to pay monthly support for the parties’ son but should instead have set up a child support trust fund, with contributions from both parties. On cross-appeal, petitioner…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In re the Marriage of FleenerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- In Re the Marriage of CastleCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1981
- In Re the Marriage of HayneCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1983
- In Re Marriage of BurhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of Steven Michael Gust and Linda Leann Gust Upon the Petition of Steven Michael GustSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- In Re the Marriage of LaloneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- In Re the Marriage of HavranCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1987
- In Re the Marriage of HowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- In Re the Marriage of McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.