In Re the Marriage of Castle
Court of Appeals of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
DONIELSON, Judge.
The petitioner wife appeals and the respondent husband cross-appeals from the parties’ dissolution decree. Petitioner challenges the economic provisions of the decree and requests attorney’s fees on appeal. The respondent contends the parties’ two children should have been placed in his custody or, in the alternative, in a joint-custody arrangement. Respondent also contends that if child custody to the wife is affirmed, his child support obligation should be reduced. We affirm.
Our review of this equitable proceeding is de novo. Iowa R.App.P. 4. Our responsibility is to review…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of WinterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Schantz v. SchantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- In Re the Marriage of WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- In Re the Marriage of BowenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Locke v. LockeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of OklandSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- In Re the Marriage of WeidnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- In Re Marriage of GeilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- In Re the Marriage of GaerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Alston v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.