Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Howell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 25, 1989No. 87-1142PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREASEN, Justice.

In this appeal we must determine how a military pension should be treated in a dissolution proceeding. The primary issue is whether a military pension should be recognized as marital property. We hold that a military pension in Iowa is to be considered marital property and divided as such in a dissolution proceeding.

Hildegard and Willis Howell were married for fourteen and one-half years. Willis retired from the military after twenty-three years of active-duty service. He was in the military throughout the marriage.

At the time of marriage, Hildegard had the equivalent of a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Kruger v. KrugerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  4. Bullock v. BullockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re Marriage of SchisselSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of BensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. In Re the Marriage of SchrinerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  3. Urbaniak v. UrbaniakSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In Re the Marriage of LeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. In Re the Marriage of BranstetterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API