Huenefeld v. Maloney
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
STEARNS, District Judge.
Upon review of the Magistrate Judge’s thorough Report and the petitioner’s Objections, I will adopt her Recommendation that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED. I agree with the Magistrate Judge’s finding that the prosecutor’s “[o]ne tells you why” statement constituted an improper comment on the petitioner’s decision not to testify (Ground 8) but that in the totality of the trial the error was not of such magnitude as to cast doubt on the integrity of the verdict.
SO ORDERED.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matos Ortiz v. Com. of Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
- Bowling v. ParkerDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2001
- Huenefeld v. DOC MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- People v. YankawayIllinois Supreme Court · 2025