Legal Opinion

McCaul v. Thayer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1887PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Monroe County. The appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtObtoN, J.

The facts of this case are briefly these: On May 9, 1884, J. T. Bears and T. S. Powers made their joint and several notes, payable to the defendant Thayer in ninety days from date, for $6,809.70, with, interest at ten per cent, after maturity. “And, to secure the payment of said amount,” the makers executed “an irrevocable power of attorney ” to enter judgment and' issue execution to collect the amount due on said note. On the same day the same parties made another note payable to the defendant Thayer within ninety days, for $18,677, with interest at ten per cent, after due, which was secured…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Clark v. IselinSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Lessee of Brewer v. BlougherSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  4. Harrington v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Wilson v. City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Coal & Coke Ry. Co. v. ConleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Second Ward Savings Bank v. SchranckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Malloy v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Mid-City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. State ex rel. City Construction Co. v. KoteckiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API