Legal Opinion
Mid-City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Allen
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 7, 1964No. Appeal, No. 265PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
This is an appeal from an order in the court below refusing to strike off a judgment, entered by virtue of a warrant of attorney included in a bond, which accompanied the execution and delivery of a mortgage.
At the time of the execution of the instruments involved, the debtor was sane, however, before judgment was confessed on the bond, he had been judicially de*175dared incompetent, under the Act of February 28, 1956, P. L. (1955) 1154, as amended, 50 P.S. §3511. The validity of the mortgage and bond is not now questioned, but it is urged that the declaration of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. LaneSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1839
- McCaul v. ThayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Johnson v. National Bank of MattoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
- Matthiessen & Weichers Refining Co. v. McMahon's AdministratorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1876
- Executors of Hill v. DayNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Estate of HeadNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Fidelity Bank v. GorsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Brennan v. EnnisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Poppe v. TauteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Aukberg v. Smith, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.