Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Murphy v. Murphy

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 8, 1940No. 191PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

The relator was convicted in the state court of the crime of possessing a machine-gun. The statute making this a crime— § 1897, sub. 1-a of the New York Penal Law, Consol.Laws, c. 40 — provides, among other things, that “the. presence of such machine-gun in any room, dwelling, structure or vehicle shall be presumptive evidence of its illegal possession by all the persons occupying the place where such machine-gun is found”. The relator argues that this presumption is so unreasonable as to violate the Fourteenth Amendment, U.S.C.A.Const., and that its use against him upon the trial vitiated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. United States Ex Rel. Kennedy v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Whitten v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. In Re FrederichSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. In Re WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Boykin v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  3. United States Ex Rel. Robinson v. YorkDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
  4. Hawk v. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  5. Scott v. District Attorney, Jefferson Parish, State of La.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API