Legal Opinion
State v. Murtha
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 15, 1980PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, C. J.
The parties have stipulated as to the relevant facts: The defendant Vera Sullivan, in 1966, applied and qualified for assistance under title XIX of the Social Security Act, “Grants to States for Medical Assistance Programs.” 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396-1396k. Since that time she has been confined to a nursing home and has been receiving aid under the title XIX program. In Connecticut, title XIX is administered by the commissioner of income maintenance; General Statutes §17-134a; and as a condition of eligibility for assistance under the program, a person’s assets and income must be extremely limited.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Doe v. Institute of Living, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Cicala v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Zeoli v. Commissioner of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Dale v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1866
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of Hartford v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Department of Social Services v. SaundersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Heffernan v. SlapinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Marcus v. Department of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Wilcox v. Willard Shopping Center AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.