Legal Opinion

B&P Littleford, LLC v. Prescott Machinery, LLC

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 13, 2020No. 1:18-cv-11425Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION B&P LITTLEFORD, LLC, Plaintiff, v Case No. 18-11425 Honorable Thomas L. Ludington PRESCOTT MACHINERY, LLC, and RAY MILLER, Defendants. ________________________________________/ ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES On May 7, 2018, Plaintiff B&P Littleford, LLC (“B&P”) filed a nine-count complaint against Defendants Prescott Machinery, LLC (“Prescott”) and Ray Miller. On April 24, 2019, a stipulation was entered that dismissed Counts 2 and 4 through 9 of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Linda Holmes v. City of Massillon, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Betts v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Robert G. Jackson, Robert P. Gettys, Attorney-Appellant v. The Law Firm of O'hara, Ruberg, Osborne and TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API