Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Hammerman & Gainer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 28, 1991No. 3-90-195-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ABOUSSIE, Justice.

Appellant, Mary Baer Watkins, was allegedly injured in the course and scope of her employment with Armstrong Moving and Storage of El Paso. She filed a workers’ compensation claim against Armstrong, which had workers’ compensation coverage through Transit Casualty Company. On October 1, 1986, Watkins settled her claim through a Compromise Settlement Agreement (“CSA”) with Transit which provided for Transit to pay a cash settlement and Watkins’ injury-related medical expenses for three years. Watkins sued appellee, Hammerman & Gainer (“H & G”), the State Board of Insurance,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Smith v. BaldwinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Weitzel v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hedley Feedlot, Inc. v. Weatherly Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1993
  3. Lyons v. Lindsey Morden Claims Management, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999
  4. Estate of Arlitt v. Paterson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  5. GXG, INC. v. Texacal Oil & Gas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API