Legal Opinion

Weitzel v. Barnes

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1985No. C-3715PublishedCited by 171 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILGARLIN, Justice.

This Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act case presents three major issues. First, does the parol evidence rule prevent proof of an oral representation as to the quality of goods when a written contract of sale gives the buyer the right to inspect those goods before purchase? Second, must a consumer show that the seller was motivated by trickery, artifice, or device, in making the representation as to the quality of the goods? Third, before a consumer can recover, is it necessary that he plead and prove that he relied upon such representation? Incidental to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. BaldwinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Town North National Bank v. BroaddusTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Light v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Big H Auto Auction, Inc. v. Saenz MotorsTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. United Postage Corp. v. KammeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by171 opinions

  1. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Adrian Cavallini v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Jefferson Associates, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re Merrill Lynch Trust Co. FSBTexas Supreme Court · 2007

166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API