Legal Opinion

Dalton v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2016No. 35,101PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHÁVEZ, Justice.

{1} Eileen Dalton purchased two used cars under separate finance contracts which contained provisions that retained self-help remedies for both parties, and that allowed either party to compel arbitration of any claim or dispute arising out of the contracts that exceeded the jurisdiction of a small claims court, which in New Mexico is $10,000. Dalton contends that the arbitration clause is substantively unconscionable on its face, and therefore is unenforceable because the self-help and small claims carve-out provisions are unreasonably one-sided. We hold that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Preston v. FerrerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Cordova v. World Finance Corp. of NMNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Rivera v. American General Financial Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Peavy v. Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Laurich v. Red Lobster Rests., LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  3. La Frontera Center, Inc. v. United Behavioral Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  4. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society v. MorenoDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  5. Jerry Erwin Assocs., Inc. v. Estate of AsherDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API