Legal Opinion

Centrust Savings Bank v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 10, 1986No. 85-1765PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REVISED OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a final order dismissing a complaint for a writ of mandamus brought by a City of Miami corporate taxpayer and property owner, Centrust Savings Bank [Centrust], against the City of Miami and other City of Miami property owners i.e., Theodore B. Gould; Olympia & York Florida Equity Corp., d/b/a Miami Center Joint Venture; and Miami Center Corporation, d/b/a Chopin Associates. The complaint seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the City of Miami to enforce the South Florida Building Code against the defendant property owners as to the latter’s buildings…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boucher v. NovotnySupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. City of Coral Gables v. State Ex Rel. WorleySupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  3. STATE EX REL. ZUCKERMAN-VERNON C. v. City of MiramarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. City of Miami Beach v. State, Ex Rel. Epicure, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. State Ex Rel. Hanna v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Detournay v. City of Coral GablesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. RHS Corp. v. City of Boynton BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. MAVERICK MEDIA GROUP v. Dept. of Transp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. City of Providence v. Estate of TarroSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  5. Detournay v. City of Coral GablesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API